Who is Interested in the Centralized System of Judicial Review? - The Mismatch between Theory and Practice in the Protection of Basic Rights

Abstract

Brazilian constitutionalism deals with two simultaneous systems of judicial review: a) the diffuse system, which, despite its particularities, resembles, in some aspects, the American system of judicial review; b) the centralized system, which is somehow similar to some European constitutional realities. This dualism has generated important debates among scholars, especially because, according to many of them, the centralized system is the new paradigm for the new Brazilian constitutionalism and the consolidation of its democracy. However, we must carefully consider whether the ongoing transformations in this new Brazilian constitutionalism, which have favored the centralized system over the diffuse one, in fact, accomplish this purpose. This research aims to question whether the centralized system of judicial review, as it is designed nowadays, has effectively contributed to the protection of basic rights and guarantees, and therefore to the consolidation of Brazilian democracy. The question “who is interested in the centralized system of judicial review?” seeks to bring the discussion of whether the centralized system of judicial review has, despite the mainstream literature, effectively protected the interests of individuals or, on the contrary, defended specific institutional interests, as those of corporations. For this purpose, this research carefully examined all the decisions made in cases involving Direct Unconstitutionality Actions (ADI) by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court from 1988 to 2012. Therefore, instead of analyzing the discourses themselves evaluating the distinct systems of judicial review, this research goes directly to the empirical perspective of the daily practice of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in deciding cases through the centralized system of judicial review. The conclusions of this research indicate that, more than protecting basic rights and guarantees, the centralized system of judicial review is an instrument for the protection of corporate interests, showing thereby a clear dissonance between the mainstream literature and the judicial practice.