Constituent power and the paradox of limited soveregnity

Abstract

Constitutionalism leads to a paradoxical acceptance of a popular sovereignty that must be absolute (to support the validity of the constitution), while limited (to respect the validity of the constitution). This paradox of limited sovereignty has been evidenced by legal and political thinkers during the last decade, and constituent power is one of the major categories used by constitutionalism to face this problem.

This article discusses the relationship between the constituent power and the democratic paradox, and for that, it (1) conducts an archeological investigation about how it was possible that political theory developed this paradoxical construction, (2) explains how political theory developed the notion of constituent power to face some consequences of this paradox, (3) shows how this category was embraced by liberal constitutionalism and (4) shoes how contemporary democratic criticism about this category leads to an identification between constituent power and popular sovereignty.