Review of the book Legal Argumentation, by Frédéric Rouvière

Abstract

The text analyzes the book Legal Argumentation, by Prof. Frédéric Rouvière. The review begins by discussing the concept of "fidelity to the law" and Rouvière's thesis regarding the formal character of the rule of justice. It also discusses the role of precedents and the book's analysis of the possibilities of interpreting rules according to their spirit. The review concludes by stating that the book contributes to understanding the paradoxes of a legal discursive practice that presents itself as organized according to dogmatic patterns, but whose realization involves much more complex dialogical standards.